Newly surfaced Trump tape poses legal issues in Georgia Election case!

Stephen Gardner discusses the Jeffrey Epstein names. The doctored Trump tapes and transcripts in Georgia. How the secretary of state is lying to cover his tracks. Trump’s January 6th case and democrats trying to remove Trump like they did Abraham Lincoln. Check out Gateway Pundint. 1. **Judge’s Release of Epstein-Associated Names:** The conversation opens with the judge’s decision to release nearly 200 names of individuals, including politicians, lawyers, and the mega-wealthy, who were associated with Jeffrey Epstein. The inquiry suggests skepticism about the judge’s sudden willingness and raises the provocative question of potential consequences for the judge. 2. **Fani Willis and Trump’s Legal Situation in Georgia:** The focus then shifts to Fani Willis, a legal figure in Georgia, and her pursuit of putting Trump in jail for alleged interference in the 2020 election. The discussion delves into emerging information about Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger’s actions, involving accusations of lying, neglecting promised audits, and awareness of issues with voting machines. This update sheds light on the evolving legal landscape surrounding Trump in Georgia. 3. **Trump’s Jan 6th Case and Allegations Against Liz Cheney:** The interview addresses Trump’s case related to the events of January 6th, where he argues for its dismissal. Trump contends that Representative Liz Cheney and the Jan 6th select committee have manipulated evidence to craft an anti-Trump narrative and may have even destroyed evidence crucial to his defense. This segment explores the allegations of evidence manipulation and its potential impact on the legal proceedings. 4. **Historical Perspective on Presidential Candidates’ Removal:** The conversation concludes by drawing a parallel with historical instances, specifically referencing the removal of Abraham Lincoln from ballots by Democrats. The discussion explores the motivations behind the concerted legal efforts to bring various lawsuits against Trump and the consequential impact on voter enfranchisement, raising questions about the underlying motivations and strategies at play. The overall tone of the interview reflects a critical examination of legal proceedings involving high-profile individuals, emphasizing potential manipulations of evidence, political motivations, and historical comparisons to contextualize current events.