FAKE HELLS ANGELS PATCH STRIPPED OFF BY MONGOLS MC

#HELLSANGELS #MONGOLSMC #HELLSANGEL So there is a video making it’s rounds on the internet where a Mongols MC prospect is taking a Hells Angels Patch off someone. It’s amazing the ignorance you find on the internet to go with the flow with the narrative this was actually a real member of the Hells Angels. SMH 00:00 OMG Some people are just ignorant 01:58 One of the biggest giveaways this is a fake patch 03:40 Do you really believe a real Hells Angel is going to just hand it over 05:30 These supporters are the big problem 07:58 How do you know this didn’t happen 09:53 This is happening everywhere 11:07 The members only club Where to Find Me: RUMBLE : YOUTUBE CHANNELS : Insane Wheelz Morning Madhouse Odysee: @insanethrottle:4 BITCHUTE: Join The INSANE THROTTLE CLUB to get access to perks: 💰 WAYS TO DONATE TO HELP THE SHOW 💰 VIA CASH APP $MOTORCYCLEMADHOUSE Watch More Videos Like This 🔥OUTLAWS MC PLAYLIST 🔥HELLS ANGELS MC PLAYLIST 🔥MONGOLS MC PLAYLIST 🔥BANDIDOS MC PLAYLIST 🔥PAGANS MC Playlist 🔥Trademark law does not let a trademark owner exert its trademark rights to stop news reporting about it or its products or services. You see proof of this everyday on the front pages of newspapers, the homepages of news websites, and countless blogs. Mainstream reporters and non-traditional journalists routinely report on earnings announcements, job lay-offs, and accounting scandals without worrying that they are infringing or diluting the trademarks of the companies and organizations they report on. There are several legal bases for this result: there is no risk of confusion between the news source and the trademark owner; nominative fair use protects this use of the trademark owner’s mark; and the federal dilution statute expressly exempts “news reporting and news commentary“ from a dilution claim. See 15 . § 1125(c)(3)(B). As noted above, one court has held that a blogger’s critical commentary on a company qualified as “news reporting and news commentary.“ See BidZirk, LLC v. Smith, 2007 WL 3119445 (. Oct. 22, 2007). Trademark law does not permit a trademark owner to use its trademark rights to silence commentary and criticism. As with news reporting, courts recognize the important First Amendment values at stake and usually deny efforts by trademark owners to encroach on legitimate commentary and criticism. There are several legal bases for this result: there is no risk of confusion between the commentator and the trademark owner, and nominative fair use may protect this use of the trademark owner’s mark. Additionally, courts are likely to find that your use of a trademark in commentary or criticism is “not in connection with a good or service“ and “noncommercial“ (the argument is especially strong for the latter category). But note that some courts may find your use of a trademark for criticism and commentary to be commercial if you host advertising or link to commercial websites. In any event, to defeat a trademark dilution claim, you do not even need to show that your use is noncommercial. The federal dilution statute creates a categorical exemption for “criticizing . . . or commenting upon the famous mark owner or the goods or services of the famous mark owner.“ 15 . § 1125(c)(3)(A)(ii). 🔥 #Harley #HarleyDavidson #Biker #Protocol #MotorcycleClub #MC #Tradition #MotorcycleRally #Motorcycles #bikers #outlawmotorcycleclubs #bikerlife #bikershorts ╔═╦╗╔╦╗╔═╦═╦╦╦╦╗╔═╗ ║╚╣║║║╚╣╚╣╔╣╔╣║╚╣═╣ ╠╗║╚╝║║╠╗║╚╣║║║║║═╣ ╚═╩══╩═╩═╩═╩╝╚╩═╩═╝