Covid Inquiry appears fundamentally biased, say scientists
55 professors and academics
An open letter to Baroness Hallett, Chair of the UK Covid Inquiry
The Inquiry must urgently address its apparent biases, assumptions, impartiality, & lack of evidence-based approach
First, the Inquiry gives the impression of being fundamentally biased.
there has been little opportunity for petitions to be brought by those who have suffered from the negative effects of pandemic policy decisions.
This is preventing a more holistic assessment of impacts on population health and wellbeing.
This lack of neutrality appears to have led to biased reasoning and predetermined conclusions, for example, to lockdown faster next time.
Second, the Inquiry is taking key assumptions for granted
instead of examining and critiquing them in light of the evidence.
The consensus position in pre-2020 pandemic plans was that non-pharmaceutical interventions, including lockdown, had weak evidence of effectiveness, and were predicted to cause substantial harm to society, especially if used for prolonged periods.
This informed the initial response to Covid in early 2020. Yet, the Inquiry assumes that these measures are effective and appropriate.
As a result, it downplays the harms to society caused by two years of emergency infection control mandates.
Third, the Inquiry lacks impartiality in the selection and questioning of expert witnesses.
It has given preferential treatment to scientific advisers on SAGE,
who have a vested interest in maintaining the justification for their policy recommendations.
Very few scientists with an alternative position have been asked to testify, and the Inquiry has been confrontational rather than inquisitorial in its questioning of these views.
The Inquiry has not seriously questioned the hypotheses and assumptions offered to government, especially from government appointed modelers, which were used to justify Covid policies.
Neither has it seriously examined the social and economic costs of lockdown.
It has also stuck to an agenda of UK exceptionalism failing to recognize the experience elsewhere in the world.
Fourth, the format of the Inquiry is impeding investigation into the key scientific and policy questions.
The Inquiry has adopted a legal format that prevents a systematic evaluation of the evidence by biomedical and social scientists on the harms of restrictions to the British public,
the impact on Covid from policies such as mandatory NPIs, and the state of evidence for best practice.
It is focused on who did or said what, rather than asking fundamental scientific questions.
Yet investigating the interplay between harms, benefits, and best practice is critical to preparing for the next pandemic.
The Inquiry, as currently functioning, appears unsuited to this task of national importance.
Fifth, the Inquiry risks reducing public trust
in the impartiality and independence of government accountability and oversight.
Its size and cost (by some estimates £300-500 million) will make it the largest public Inquiry ever undertaken to date, and yet its shortcomings, if not addressed, risk compromising the credibility of future public inquiries.
We believe the Inquiry has a significant and important mission and we would like to see it succeed.
However, if it is to do so, these shortcomings need to be urgently addressed.
The Inquiry must invite a much broader range of scientific experts with more critical viewpoints.
It must also review the evidence on diverse topics so that it can be fully informed of relevant science and the economic and social cost of Covid policies to British society.
We, the undersigned, believe this is an urgent national priority and fundamental to ensuring that future pandemic response is evidence- based and maximizes the health and well-being of all.
We, the undersigned, are a group of UK public health scholars and academics in related disciplines, widely published in our fields, deeply concerned that the Covid Inquiry is not living up to its mission to evaluate the mistakes made during the pandemic, whether Covid measures were appropriate, and to prepare the country for the next pandemic.
1 view
0
0
2 months ago 00:04:08 1
Australians Deserve Answers
2 months ago 01:17:41 1
Dr. Hazan on Ivermectin, COVID, and MRNA Vaccines.
2 months ago 00:05:06 2
How can the Stroke Foundation say Covid Vaccines don’t cause strokes when they cause clots?
2 months ago 00:16:28 1
Secrets of Influenza
3 months ago 00:04:11 1
The Making of COYOTE SUNSET | Behind The Scenes
3 months ago 00:20:29 1
Becoming mentally tough
4 months ago 00:03:14 1
Detik detik Menegangkan, Pasukan Azov Tertembak hingga Ketar Ketir saat Dikepung Pasukan Chechnya
5 months ago 00:05:44 1
Qusad Einy (Live Cover) by Serge Nikol and Etric Lyons
5 months ago 00:06:46 1
Disabled by the CV-jab. Gaslighted by doctors. Still no help (Kara Potter’s Story) - Inquiry
5 months ago 00:13:30 1
9 times out of 10 residents were prescribed End-of-Life medication | Care Home Managers tell Inquiry
5 months ago 00:13:25 1
They were dying at a rate of 300 per week | Care Home Relatives Scotland KC tells COVID-19 Inquiry
5 months ago 00:07:49 1
Neil Oliver discusses ‘Do Not Resuscitate’ orders after concerns raised by AGE Scotland at Inquiry
5 months ago 00:02:37 1
Injured Australians Deserve Better
5 months ago 00:12:31 1
Down’s discrimination
5 months ago 00:03:54 1
Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry | Exposing the Truth | Highlights
5 months ago 00:04:30 1
“Our Hospitals were Half-Empty” Glasgow Porter tells Scottish COVID-19 inquiry
6 months ago 00:54:05 1
Scottish Covid Inquiry | Exposing the Truth | Full Documentary | Film by Freedom Podcast
6 months ago 00:05:55 1
‘The Lies and Cover-Ups Are Non Stop and No One Is Reporting Our Story’ | Scottish COVID Inquiry
6 months ago 00:05:19 1
Cost of the COVID-19 inquiry - Kay Smith (The Truth Speaker)
6 months ago 00:08:25 1
’People making life or death decisions did NOT have the experience’ COVID Inquiry shock revelations
6 months ago 00:14:29 1
Midazolam deaths
6 months ago 00:09:12 1
Georgia Travel Guide - Best Places to Visit & Top Attractions | Rayna Tours
6 months ago 00:08:26 1
Scottish COVID Inquiry: Epidemiology Presentation with Dr Ashley Croft 27/7/2023
6 months ago 00:29:30 1
Quand le mensonge médiatique devient vérité judiciaire